On May 31, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > >> I must say I'm generally disappointed with os-prober and have >> ideas to move away from it. I'll start another topic for it. > > I agree. I would prefer adding an include command so grub.cfg could just do > something like: > > include /boot/grub/grub.d/*.cfg > > and have an install procedure drop in one or more menu items instead of every > os install or update rewriting the entire grub.cfg every time. Or for GRUB to be a lot more dynamic by scanning the EFI System partition for bootloaders it recognizes, an effectively creates a grub.cfg on the fly based on ESP contents, and NVRAM contents. I think the present behavior is unreliable, and makes GRUB a very narrowly useful boot manager. So the question is, does GRUB want to grow into a more capable boot manager rather than just a collection of bootloaders for different OS's. Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
