On Mon, Feb 27, 2017, 09:55 Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 27.02.2017 03:37, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko пишет:
> ...
> >>>>> This is not NT-style. NT uses partition offset. Who uses this format?
> >> Are
> >>>>
> >>>> This is used by util-linux and Linux kernel.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>  *      6) PARTUUID=00112233-4455-6677-8899-AABBCCDDEEFF representing
> >> the
> >>>>  *         unique id of a partition if the partition table provides
> it.
> >>>>  *         The UUID may be either an EFI/GPT UUID, or refer to an
> MSDOS
> >>>>  *         partition using the format SSSSSSSS-PP, where SSSSSSSS is a
> >>>> zero-
> >>>>  *         filled hex representation of the 32-bit "NT disk
> signature",
> >>>> and PP
> >>>>  *         is a zero-filled hex representation of the 1-based
> partition
> >>>> number.
> >>>>
> >>>>> you sure that partition numbers are synced with user? Even in
> presence
> >> of
> >>>>> Solaris and bsd partitions.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> It is not clear what we should return for nested partition. I'm not
> sure
> >>>> whether linux kernel scans nested partitions at all in which case we
> >>>> probably should follow the suite and assign PARTUUID to top-level
> >>>> partitions only.
> >>>>
> >>> Linux scans nested partitions and it uses though numeration in
> dev/sdaX,
> >> in
> >>> some cases shifting numbering of normal partitions. In those cases grub
> >> and
> >>> Linux numeration get out of sync
> >>>
> >>
> >> Can you provide example?
> >
> > Bsd and Solaris partitions. I remember we had problem with numbering of
> > those.
> >
>
> Linux ignores nested BSD partitions (just tested). There are no special
> files created. Of course someone needs to test what happens under
> *BSD/Solaris in this case.
>
Kpartx or normal sdX? Is bsd-partition support enabled in kernel build?

>
> I never liked idea of artificial partition GUIDs for MBR, but as long as
> only Linux is using them and we are consistent with its usage - so be it.
>
> >> I tried to create nested partition table, but
> >> Linux will not display it (actually attempt to "blockdev --rereadpt
> >> /dev/vda5" fails with "Invalid argument").
> >>
> >>         if (!disk_part_scan_enabled(disk) || bdev != bdev->bd_contains)
> >>                 return -EINVAL;
> >>
> >> Where bdev->bd_contains points to containing device for partition and to
> >> itself for the whole disk.
> >>
> >> As util-linux does not scan partition table itself, it does show these
> >> nested partitions either.
> >>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> Grub-devel@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel

Reply via email to