On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 07:10:32PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 12:33:42PM -0400, Daniel P. Smith wrote: > > On 07/16/2018 08:06 AM, Daniel Kiper wrote: > > > In general I am not against reorganization you are mentioning above. > > > Though I think that then you should rearange Matthew code and repost > > > it. Of course if Matthew does not object. > > > > I can align Matthew's code or if he would like, he is more than welcome > > to collaborate on the solution. > > There's a lot of user demand for TPM2 support in grub, so my preference > would be: > > 1) Review and merge the verifiers framework
OK, as I said earlier I will post it with some comments and minor fixes in a week or two. > 2) Update the current TPM2 code to match and review and merge that > 3) Ensure that the functionality matches user expectations and then > develop a more generic midlayer based on that to support additional TPM > backends > > My concern about doing (3) before (2) is that it may take multiple > attempts to develop something that works for us, and delay being able to > provide functionality that people would like to take advantage of. I > think some real-world use would make the process easier. This option works for me too. If Daniel S. is OK with that we can proceed. Daniel _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
