El 7/3/19 a las 20:58, Daniel Kiper escribió: > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 07:05:20PM +0100, Jesús Diéguez Fernández wrote: > > [...] >
[...] >> - And from a practical point of view, in case that I need to setup a >> custom handler for this, is it mandatory to ship the patch with it or >> could it be added later (maybe adding a TODO now)? > > I can accept this patch series without #GP handler if: > - you add warning to the GRUB doc that #GP for rdmsr/wrmsr are not > handled and system reboots; so, potential users have to be careful > using these modules, > - you add TODO notice to the code saying that generic #GP handling > should be added to the GRUB code, That's what I had in mind. > - you promise me that at some point, let's say after GRUB release, > you will try to implement generic #GP handler. > > Is this acceptable for you? > > Daniel > I think that having a generic #GP handler is a nice improvement. As I said before, I don't know exactly the size of the rabbit hole I'm entering, so I can't guarantee a delivery date, but I do guarantee that I'll do my best. GRUB is becoming very interesting to me, if you don't mind having a newbie around here, maybe making one question or two sometimes, then we have a deal. :) Jesus _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
