On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 01:26:20PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 07:00:48PM +0100, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > > One thing I'm not sure about here is whether it's fine to declare the > > argon2 mod's license as GPLv3. The code is licensed under CC0/Apache > > 2.0, where the latter is compatible with GPLv3. But I don't know whether > > it's legit to just say "Yeah, this mod is a GPLv3 one". > > Could you give me a reference to the doc/spec or what not which says that > it is legit to do that? I will consult this with GNU legal folks.
With "that" you probably mean combining Apache 2.0 and GPLv3, right? I've taken this from GNU's list of licenses [1], which explicitly mentions Apache 2.0 as compatible with version 3 of the GNU GPL. Patrick [1]: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#apache2
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
