No, it's license-incompatible. Please don't use that code. Le sam. 17 août 2024, 16:44, Andrew Hamilton <adham...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hello, > > I'm thinking to try to address bug 63894 (grub_datetime2unixtime() > still has the year 2038 problem): > https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63894 > > I confirmed the issue is still partially present in > include/grub/datetime.h... the following checks are still present and > the issue mentioned local variable limitations are also still an > issue: > > grub_datetime2unixtime (const struct grub_datetime *datetime, grub_int64_t > *nix) > { > grub_int32_t ret; > ... > if (datetime->year > 2038 || datetime->year < 1901) > return 0; > ... > > Simply changing the locals to 64-bit and removing the 2038 limit does > not completely solve the issue, at some point past 2038 the result of > this algorithm produces incorrect results. > > To completely solve the issue, I wanted to use the algorithm > implemented by the Linux kernel in mktime64 (time.c around line 449): > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/kernel/time/time.c?h=v6.11-rc3 > > Would it be acceptable to base the GRUB implementation on the Linux > Kernel algorithm above? > > Thanks, > Andrew > > _______________________________________________ > Grub-devel mailing list > Grub-devel@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel >
_______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
