On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 12:13:25PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann via Grub-devel wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 10:05:27AM +0800, Michael Chang wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 11:13:16AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > > However the efi_uga module is only enabled for x86_64-efi and i386-efi. > > > > The script should therefore check the CPU target before attempting to > > > > load it. > > > > > > Or just remove efi_uga? > > > > > > tianocore has removed uga support from the source tree last year, noting > > > that "The UGA I/O and Draw protocols are deprecated since UEFI 2.0 was > > > introduced". UEFI 2.0 spec was released in January 2006. > > > > > > https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/11200 > > > > Thanks for the info. Yes, it looks like a viable decision to remove it > > as well. However the patch is intended as a quick fix for the released > > 2.14 branch, where efi_uga is still a supported module. > > > > Perhaps a separate drop request to drop it in the next GRUB release > > would be better, and would also allow more time to collect feedback. > > Well, the removal can be staged in two steps, first remove from the > config, and in case nobody misses it for one release cycle purge it > completely from the code base. > > IMHO removal from the config is fine even for the 2.14 branch.
I just did a quick check by removing all the efi_* modules from the config and the terminal falls back to text menu gracefully. So it seems to me this is not too much hassle for users: even if the efi video drivers missing, the system still boots and they can add the modules back to the config later. So I'm not against the idea, but I'd like to hear more from Daniel if he's OK with this. :) Thanks, Michael > > take care, > Gerd > > > _______________________________________________ > Grub-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
