Dear Arianna and Bob,
thank You for the answers, now I understand my mistake. I tried to use
same procedure from GSAS+EXPGUI, where I used to have different set of
GU,GX and LY for different phases. Please correct me, if I'm wrong. I
that approach profiles were fitted with purely mathematical functions
without physical meaning. Now, in GSASII, we try to fit shape with
parameters by functions with physical meaning, like domain size,
mustrain etc.
I'll also consider using transparency for my fitting. I completely
forgot about that and actually it seems reasonable in my case.
Thank You one again for your help.
Kind regards,
Bartłomiej Gędziorowski
--
Bartłomiej Gędzioroski, Ph.D.
AGH University of Science and Technology,
Faculty of Energy and Fuels,
Department of Hydrogen Energy,
al. Mickiewicza 30
30-059 Krakow, Poland
_______________________________________________
GSAS-II mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/gsas-ii
