Dear Brian,

if I may to drop the comment. The enquiry is not entirely without merit. It is not infrequent that one combines information from many sources to build a model and constrains help to fix deficiency of a single method. I guess that one case where a hard limit could be useful is a case of vacancies in non-stoichiometric compounds. As you say it is easy to constrain a site shared by multiple elements if they add up to 1. Yet, there has been always a problem, also for GSAS I, to deal with a sum of vacancy + element on a site. From this what I observed the refinement was trying to compensate vacancies with artificiality increased thermal displacement parameters if the data at higher 2-Theta were not "perfect" (actually only a case of good TOF with neutrons or an exceptional quality X-ray diffraction). If I know that the occupancy cannot be larger than e.g. 1 for a site from other sources (e.g. spectroscopy or other x-ray neutron diffraction experiments) then it should be possible to set a hard limit on the site. Of course such decision must be well substantiated. Otherwise one risks producing some rubbish results...

Best wishes

Andrzej



Am 12.09.2016 um 11:42 schrieb Toby, Brian H.:
No.

To be honest I am not sure why one would want to do this. When a parameter refines "out of range” it tells you something about your data or model. With a restraint, you would never know that for example, a Uiso value is refining negative by > 2 sigma or a occupancy is >>1. It makes sense to me to define a model so that the sum of occupancies is fixed — a well defined assumption. Defining a range for a parameter scares me as I could never know that my model is highly flawed is some way.

Brian

On Sep 12, 2016, at 10:27 AM, Ivo Alxneit <ivo.alxn...@psi.ch <mailto:ivo.alxn...@psi.ch>> wrote:

Dear all

is there a way to restrict fitted parameters to a certain range? For
example restrict site occupancies to positive numbers or to a range such
as 0.9-1.0?

thanks for any help
--
Dr. Ivo Alxneit
Catalysis for Energy Group
Bioenergy and Catalysis Laboratory        phone: +41 56 310 4092
Paul Scherrer Institute                     fax: +41 56 310 2688
CH-5232 Villigen                      gnupg key: 0x515E30C7
Switzerland
https://www.psi.ch/ceg/catalysis-for-energy-group/

_______________________________________________
GSAS-II mailing list
GSAS-II@mailman.aps.anl.gov
https://mailman.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/gsas-ii

********************************************************************
Brian H. Toby, Ph.D.                          office: 630-252-5488
Advanced Photon Source Chief Computational Scientist
Senior Physicist/Computational X-ray Science Group Leader
9700 S. Cass Ave, Bldg. 401/B4192       cell: 630-327-8426
Argonne National Laboratory
Argonne, IL 60439-4856        e-mail: brian dot toby at anl dot gov
********************************************************************
"We will restore science to its rightful place, and wield technology's wonders... We will harness the sun and the winds and the soil to fuel our cars and run our factories... All this we can do. All this we will do."



_______________________________________________
GSAS-II mailing list
GSAS-II@mailman.aps.anl.gov
https://mailman.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/gsas-ii


--
--
Dr. Andrzej Falenty <afal...@uni-goettingen.de>
Abt. Kristallographie
GZG, Georg-August-Universität
Goldschmidtstraße 1
D-37077 Göttingen

Tel. 0049 551 3912546
http://kristall.uni-mki.gwdg.de/

_______________________________________________
GSAS-II mailing list
GSAS-II@mailman.aps.anl.gov
https://mailman.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/gsas-ii

Reply via email to