At Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:44:56 +0200, Tuomo Keskitalo wrote: > Do you mean the compatibility to GSL 1 types by the compatibility cost? > When talking about GSL 2 I don't think we should give too much value to > maintaining backwards compatibility. GSL 1 is not going to cease to > exist, and people who have tied themselves deeply to GSL 1 data > structures can continue to use it.
I'd say it's a significant benefit if people don't have to modify their code. -- Brian Gough
