At Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:50:44 -0600, Rhys Ulerich wrote: > I'm willing to take a stab at providing the necessary error handling > underneath flame to make it play nice with GSL's error handling > model. > The obvious choice is to adopt GSL's routines. However, flame is > LGPL and so adopting GSL's GPLed error handling directly is not an > option. > > Do you know of an LGPL project that you believe does a good job in > this regard?
I think the amount of code is so small that the licensing shouldn't be a concern here. If anyone wants to use the error macro definitions or error handler from GSL under the LGPL I am fine with that. -- Brian Gough
