At Mon, 3 May 2010 13:40:46 -0500, Rhys Ulerich wrote: > I've not seen any references to this on the mailing list or in > savannah. Let me know if you'd like me to file a bug.
Thanks for finding that. Please do file a bug in the tracker at http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=gsl. (A patch and test case would also be handy!) Looking at the source, there's an explicit check for 0^0 in gsl_complex_pow but it is missing from gsl_complex_pow_real, so it looks like a simple oversight. -- Brian Gough GNU Scientific Library - http://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/
