At Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:38:19 +0100, Brian Gough wrote: > The overflow exception is a valid warning. It's also a bug in the > sense that it is avoidable (although the end result is correct, z=-1 > since 1/inf=0). It would be better written as (32/y)/y.
Of course, apart from the extra factor of 2^5 that gives an underflow instead but it's probably preferable to an overflow.
