Derek Karssenberg wrote: > > Hi, > > Just tried PCRaster maps as input for variogram calculation, using a command file >like: > > data(test):'vario.map'; > > The variogram I got was quite different from what I expected, and I tried > > map2col vario.map vario.col > (which easily converts your PCRaster map to column file) > > and the command file: > > data(test): 'vario.col', x=1, y=2, v=3; > > The resulting variogram was completely different (closer to what I expected). > > What is wrong in this case, me, PCRaster or Gstat? Gstat. (I have this terrible deja-vu of having seen this all before.)
Until further notice I disrecommend to use gstat for calculating variograms from maps. I will look into it, but that may take a few weeks. Best regards, -- Edzer
