On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Charles Bacon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any chance you have grid-proxy-init aliased?  Check "type -a
> grid-proxy-init".

I'm 100% sure, I installed this from scratch myself and no one else
would have known, let alone bothered to alias it.  Here's the output:

grid-proxy-init is /opt/globus/4.2.0/bin/grid-proxy-init

>
> The output you showed looks a little bit like what happens if I run
> "grid-proxy-init -draft".  Then my extensions are:
>        X509v3 extensions:
>            X509v3 Key Usage: critical
>                Digital Signature, Key Encipherment, Data Encipherment
>            1.3.6.1.4.1.3536.1.222: critical
>                0.0
> ..+.......
>
> If I add a path-length, you can see that the row of dots gets longer:
>        X509v3 extensions:
>            X509v3 Key Usage: critical
>                Digital Signature, Key Encipherment, Data Encipherment
>            1.3.6.1.4.1.3536.1.222: critical
>                0.0
> ..+............

Odd, mine does not increment like yours, check this out:

(no grid-proxy-init options set on the CLI):

X509v3 extensions:
   X509v3 Key Usage: critical
   Digital Signature
   1.2.6.1.5.5.7.1.14: critical
       0....0
..+.......


(with "-rfc" only):

X509v3 extensions:
   X509v3 Key Usage: critical
   Digital Signature
   1.2.6.1.5.5.7.1.14: critical
       0....0
..+.......


(with "-rfc -path-length <N>" where N is any number):

X509v3 extensions:
   X509v3 Key Usage: critical
   Digital Signature
   1.2.6.1.5.5.7.1.14: critical
       0....0
..+.......

See that?  At no point does it change.  Any ideas what's up with that?


>
> Whereas "grid-proxy-init -rfc -path-length 2" gets me:
>        X509v3 extensions:
>            X509v3 Key Usage: critical
>                Digital Signature, Key Encipherment, Data Encipherment
>            Proxy Certificate Information: critical
>                Path Length Constraint: 02
>                Policy Language: Inherit all
>
> Anything change for you if you add -rfc?

No change at all, it's the same output as above every time.

>
>
> Charles

Reply via email to