I wanted to note that the Globus team is planning to build on the work that 
Mattias at NorduGrid has done, to make native packaging (rpm, deb) standard for 
the Globus Toolkit, for future releases (targeted for 5.2).  
In the meantime, the GT4 prews packages, or GT5 packages (packaged by Mattias, 
as Steffen just mentioned) in the Fedora or Debian repositories may be helpful.

If you want to learn more about GPT, the canonical documentation is available at
http://grid.ncsa.illinois.edu/gpt/

Eric


----- "Steffen Moeller" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Arn wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Joel Schneider <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > 
> >>> I've also been looking for an RPM (or some similar package) which
> >>> I can hand to our sysadmins and have a simplified install
> process.
> >> The EPEL repository has a bunch of globus-* packages for RHEL:
> >>
> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL
> >>
> >> Those packages might be useful, or serve as an example for creating
> Globus
> >> RPMs.  However, I couldn't say much more than that, because I
> haven't
> >> personally tried using those packages.
> >>
> > 
> > Thanks, I'll look into those.
> > 
> > Another good option would be to have detailed instructions on how
> to
> > build a binary package using gpt.
> > Any pointers ?
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> Debian and Fedora have the Globus 4 preWS packages already in their
> archives. I just talked back to Mattias from Uppsala and can now
> reliably
> report also the latest Globus 5 packaging already to have been done.
> It is
> basically a side-effort by the friendly NorduGrid folks.
> 
> Please check out http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/ for Globus 5
> packages, both for Fedora and Debian. For those of you building the
> packages from source, I would like to point out that there is a build
> dependency on the very latest doxygen, which only find its way to the
> distributions now
> (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=564703).
> 
> It would help this list, so I presume, if you could give some feedback
> on
> how the packages worked for you. There should be no problem
> whatsoever, but
> if there is something you are missing or that is unclear then your
> report
> and the subsequent clarification(s) will help others.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Steffen

Reply via email to