Dear friends:

Further to my email below, we have set up a Web survey to make it easier for 
you to provide this information. 

See: https://strategy.wufoo.com/forms/globus-toolkit-user-survey

It will be most helpful to us if you can reply by July 7.

Many thanks,

Ian.



On Jun 24, 2011, at 3:52 AM, Ian Foster wrote:

> Dear friends:
> 
> We are preparing a proposal to the National Science Foundation to provide 
> continued support for the Globus Toolkit (GT): specifically, for the GRAM, 
> GridFTP, Integrated Information Service, Grid Security Infrastructure, and 
> jGlobus components.
> 
> Our success will depend in part on our ability to get NSF researchers and 
> educators to communicate to their program managers the importance of this 
> technology for their work. In the absence of such communications, NSF will 
> conclude that Globus software isn't that important.
> 
> We know that there are many users out there. For example, just in the last 24 
> hours, GridFTP servers with usage reporting enabled reported 17M transfers, 
> totaling 0.5 PB (that's an average of 200 files/sec and 6 GB/sec). But we 
> need to know *who*, *what*, and *why* for this usage--and for the usage of 
> other components.
> 
> Thus, we would like to request your help as follows:
> 
> 1) If you an NSF-supported researcher or educator who uses GT in your work, 
> please:
> 
> a) tell us how and why it is important to you
> 
> b) tell us what improvements and enhancements will be most important to you
> 
> c) let us know if you are prepared to contact your NSF program manager to 
> tell them these things, and who that would be
> 
> Note: While we welcome detail and completeness, just a few words on these 
> topics will be immensely useful
> 
> 2) If you are a non-NSF-supported researcher or educator (in the US or 
> elsewhere) who uses GT in the work, please:
> 
> a) tell us how and why it is important to you
> 
> b) tell us what improvements and enhancements will be most important to you
> 
> c) tell us who supports your work
> 
> Regards -- Ian.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to