Hi Mike, I have run multiple tests. But I forgot to mention a difference between the instances. I have started the instance from port 2811 with xinetd without any difference from the installation. However, I have started the instance to listen from port 6969 as the follow way:
SERVER1: /usr/sbin/globus-gridftp-server -p 7777 -dn -aa -S /usr/sbin/globus-gridftp-server -p 6969 -r server1:7777,server3:7777 -aa -S SERVER2: /usr/sbin/globus-gridftp-server -p 7777 -dn -aa -S /usr/sbin/globus-gridftp-server -p 6969 -r server2:7777,server4:7777 -aa -S After that, I have made a test putting the line *-r server1:7777,server3:7777 -aa -S* in */etc/xinetd.d/gridftp* as a * server_args* and the problem also happened with the port 2811. I hope you can help me. Best Regards, Fabio de Souza On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Michael Link <[email protected]> wrote: > Transfers using 2811 always succeed and transfers to 6969 always fail? > That is very strange if they have identical configurations. Have you run > multiple tests of each? It is possible that there is an intermittent error > that just seems to affect one instance. > > Mike > > > On 9/24/2013 3:24 PM, Fabio Moreira wrote: > >> Hi Mike, >> >> There is no difference between the servers and both servers are running >> an instance on 2811 and 6969. >> >> Thanks, >> >> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Michael Link <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> But each server is running an instance on 2811 and 6969. Is there a >> difference in the version or configuration of those besides the port >> number? >> >> Mike >> >> >> >> On 9/24/2013 8:38 AM, Fabio Moreira wrote: >> >> Hi Mike, >> >> Server 1 has 6 cores with 96GB running CentOS 6.3 and Server2 has >> 8 >> cores with 128GB running CentOS 6.4 and both with Globus 5.2.4. >> Besides >> that, there are no difference between them. >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Michael Link <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: >> >> What is different about the two servers in terms of software >> versions, configuration, etc? >> >> >> Mike >> >> >> On 9/20/2013 1:06 PM, Fábio Moreira wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I´m facing a big problem while transferring files >> bigger than 100GB. >> When I transfer the way bellow, a message of >> end-of-file appears >> in the >> middle of the transfer. It happens with whatever file >> bigger >> than 100GB >> and never in the same point of the file. >> >> *globus-url-copy -vb gsiftp://server1:6969/lustre/_** >> ___150G >> >> >> >> gsiftp://server2:6969/lustre/ >> Source: gsiftp://server1:6969/lustre/ >> Dest: gsiftp://server2:6969/lustre/ >> 150G >> >> 76896796672 bytes 98.44 MB/sec avg >> 94.90 >> MB/sec inst >> error: an end-of-file was reached >> globus_xio: An end of file occurred* >> >> >> However, when I transfer as the follow way, the transfer >> finishes correctly: >> * >> globus-url-copy -vb gsiftp://server1/lustre/150G >> gsiftp://server2/lustre/ >> Source: gsiftp://***server*1/lustre/ >> Dest: gsiftp://***server*2/lustre/ >> 150G >> >> 161061273600 bytes 97.30 MB/sec avg >> 96.11 >> MB/sec inst* >> >> >> Has anyone ever faced this kind of trouble? >> >> Thanks in advance! >> >> Best Regards, >> >> >>
