Is nobody able to comment on this?

Brock Palen
www.umich.edu/~brockp
CAEN Advanced Computing
XSEDE Campus Champion
[email protected]
(734)936-1985



On Sep 11, 2014, at 3:54 PM, Brock Palen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ok now I am really confused,
> 
> I have Transfer stats entries with:
> 
> START DATE NBYTES
> DATE NBYTES
> DATE
> 
> Why are there three types and why are some not complete information?
> 
> Im tracking the performance of our transfers, NYBTES/(DATE - START)  but when 
> they are not there kinda hard todo.
> 
> We are using the package:
> globus-gridftp-server-6.43-1gt.x86_64
> 
> Part of the globusonline service.
> 
> Brock Palen
> www.umich.edu/~brockp
> CAEN Advanced Computing
> XSEDE Campus Champion
> [email protected]
> (734)936-1985
> 
> 
> 
> On Sep 11, 2014, at 3:17 PM, Brock Palen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> I made a logstash parser for transfer logs, but ran into issues because it 
>> appears that that there are Transfer stats
>> Entries that do not have full information:
>> 
>> Eg:
>> What I expect:
>> [15298] Wed Jul 16 11:08:42 2014 :: Transfer stats: 
>> DATE=20140716150842.633689 HOST=flux-xfer1.engin.umich.edu 
>> PROG=globus-gridftp-server NL.EVNT=FTP_INFO START=20140716150841.618581 
>> USER=brockp FILE=/tmp/brockp/linux_x64_64_sfx.exe BUFFER=87380 BLOCK=262144 
>> NBYTES=280590752 VOLUME=/ STREAMS=4 STRIPES=1 DEST=[141.212.30.10] TYPE=RETR 
>> CODE=226
>> 
>> What I find and choke on:
>> [22304] Mon Sep  8 16:45:52 2014 :: Transfer stats: 
>> DATE=20140908204552.177237 HOSTS=1944 VOLUME=/ STREAMS=2 STRIPES=1 
>> DEST=[141.212.30.10] TYPE=STOR CODE=226
>> 
>> 
>> What are the meanings of these two different formats?  Is the first one, 
>> with the transfer size etc, the final summary of the transfer?  Can I just 
>> ignore the others if I want to collect statistics on our gridftp servers?
>> 
>> Brock Palen
>> www.umich.edu/~brockp
>> CAEN Advanced Computing
>> XSEDE Campus Champion
>> [email protected]
>> (734)936-1985
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to