On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:38:35PM +0100, Álvaro Lopes wrote: > Werner Almesberger wrote: > > Dave Ball wrote: > >> I've just implemented this with the NTDG1100L (new part, so the symbol > >> could do with a review too), > > > > - Why not reuse the SI1040X ? They're virtually identical. > > I asked myself the same question. > > But I guess Dave has a good answer for it. Actually I assumed you had > discussed that on IRC. It's a new part, and might be hard to source (ie, not > in stock for > the first prototypes).
How is the NTDG1100L difficult to source? It's in stock at Digi-Key and available in quantities down to one as cut tape or Digi-Reel. How much easier to source do you want it? There's even a pin compatible substitute with roughly the same specifications. > And I'd really prefer enabling that using a longer delay line (ie, CPU > output). That would have other benefits too, like lower consumption at power > up. So you want to turn on the 2.8 V I/O supply separately? Please elaborate on how much current you are talking about here, because I don't see how it would be significant given that we are already charging a 100 uF capacitor. -- Rask Ingemann Lambertsen Danish law requires addresses in e-mail to be logged and stored for a year _______________________________________________ gta02-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/gta02-core
