Ah, I must now add that what I thought was a workaround only works until you refresh. I had all the 'set dates' at the bottom and the rest sorting correctly and then uploaded, but now I see that if I refresh the 'set dates' are all back in weird positions (as you can see) and the ticklers in between sort correctly, but are separated from the overall sort.
Very strange! Nothing I can do seems to move the 'set date' ticklers from those positions after refresh... On Feb 26, 4:53 pm, jacques <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > I sent a post about this before, but it didn't appear. I have more > information now anyway... > The problem is that Ticklers aren't sorting correctly (this is in the > latest build, unrelated to previously discussed issue). But now I see > that it is only when ticklers without a date are introduced. Perhaps > they are not meant to be used this way but I have been entering a few > ticklers that will have dates set in the future, just as placeholders > - for exams and other assessment that haven't been set. > > Anyway, if a 'set date' tickler is created, and then a tickler with a > proper date is created or modified, the one with the correct date will > sort below the 'set date' one. The workaround is to modify all the > 'set date' ones and they will then go below the dated ones and all > will be sorted correctly. They seem to act as some sort of halt to the > sorting. So if you have several dated ticklers, then a 'set date', > then some more dated then the dated ones will sort correctly between > the 'set date' ones, but each 'set date' tickler (which are in that > position because the dated ticklers below were modified after the 'set > date' ones) will remain static. > > OK, it's a weird problem, but easy to see if you go to my MGTD > at:http://ivashko.tiddlyspot.com/ > > I have just let one dated tickler fall out of order by modifying it > recently and it is now below all the 'set date' ones. If I then modify > each 'set date' tickler they will order correctly. > > If anyone can point me to the sorting code I'd be happy to have a > look... > Thanks, > Jacques. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GTD TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/GTD-TiddlyWiki?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
