What I did try was, as much as possible, flagging as 'next action' only the most urgent or critical action in each project (or maybe 2...), hence considerably reducing the size of my '@work' list. Basically, I just filtered in advance by urgency project by project, rather that doing it on the fly while parsing the whole list of next actions.
This strategy did reduce the amount of anxiety in front of my '@work' list: I no longer had the feeling I had to make the right choice of which next action to pick up and execute, out of the 50 I had in the context... If you consider GTD as a methodology for reducing stress, it is interesting to give it a try. -- Frederic On 2 déc, 15:30, Jeff <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Frederic Aguiard > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I also tried when applicable to reduce the number of next actions per > > project to 1, only keeping as active the one with the highest > > 'priority', and moving the others to 'future', even if it was possible > > to do them immediately. > > I find this intriguing. Can you elaborate on how having only 1 next > action per project has worked out for you? > > -- > Jeff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GTD TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gtd-tiddlywiki?hl=en.
