After having read gnome guide to be added as a module, I can say that we have all the cards to be accepted. The cost of that would be: - follow the six-month release cycle of GNOME, including freeze times - start using gnome resources (Git and bugzilla).
I don't see any real advantages counterbalancing this. We would just get a shiny badge and maybe some help. Are there things I don't see? On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Luca Invernizzi <[email protected]>wrote: > For this, we should choose a maintainer. > I'll try to read though the documentation in the next few days and list on > the bug (https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/gtg/+bug/520171) the actions that > we should take. > Never surrender. > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Luca Invernizzi > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Sure! >> >> - We are famous enough >> - We have GNOME in the name of the project >> - tasque and tomboy is in there http://l10n.gnome.org/module/ which are >> very similar (ahem..) to us. >> - we may attract some developer >> >> What are the cons to this? I can list one: >> - bureaucracy to get in >> >> ps: I've already reported a similar bug >> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/gtg/+bug/520171 >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Lionel Dricot <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2010/02/17/gnome-3-0-module-proposals-welcome-now/ >>> >>> Do you think that GTG should be proposed as a GNOME 3 module ? >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~gtg-contributors >>> Post to : [email protected] >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~gtg-contributors >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~gtg-contributors Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~gtg-contributors More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
