On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 12:06:13PM +0200, Lionel Dricot wrote: > The performance test is mainly affected by the TreeTest class. We should > either make that TreeTest class seamless or make a test that doesn't use > it. > I'm interested in any input regarding performances. I've made test_speed disable the TreeTest. It does perform way better, as it takes ~1sec on my machine. I believe we still have a bug, as the time takes still scales exponentially with respect to the number of nodes. 100 nodes => ~1 sec 150 nodes => ~8 secs 200 nodes => ~40 secs However, this is not release-critical anymore.
> > > > - gtk errors causing segfaults (sporadic) > > That's here that anyone could help : find a way to reproduce such errors. > If we can reproduce it, we could probably write a test and then fix the > error. > > > - in the tags tree, when adding a tag all the partial tags are > > displayed(@t, @ta, @tag) > > That should be fixed in rev 892 and there's two tests for that (one in > liblarch testing, the other in tagstore testing) It works. Thanks, Lionel! > > > Another error that I want to see fixed before implementing drag-n-drop is > the "child" status in the gtk.TreeView. Namely : > > - Tasks with children doesn't have the + to view children after a refresh > unless you open the task Bug opened > - I didn't find anyway to expand the children by default. mh, gtk.Treeview().expand_all() doesn't work with liblarch as treemodel. I wonder if it's a bug. > > > Lionel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~gtg-contributors Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~gtg-contributors More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
