On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Alexander Barnickel <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 15.04.2012 14:11, schrieb Bertrand Rousseau: > > > Hi, > > They look great! It feels more and more solid too! > > I have again some remarks I'd like to share with you, they're below. (btw, I > hope I don't seem too picky. I really like what you're proposing!) > > > No, you don't seem picky at all. In fact, i always wait for you to respond, > because you are the strictest critic (in a positive manner) :-) > > > Thanks again for the awesome work you're doing! Tell us when your mockups > will be available for edition (I'd like to test some ideas)! > > I wrote Allan today about the git repo. As soon as i can upload files, i'll > tell you. > > > > Regarding "Inbox", you seem to suggest that the inbox is the same as the > "all tags" filter. I don't think it's a good idea to merge both. Inbox is > reserved for incoming/not yet sorted tasks. All tags (or, I'd say, "All > tasks") should be a separate items that allows to look at all available (and > not-yet-done) tasks, without any kind of filtering. It should be a separate > item. > > You're right on that, but then we will need another control, something that > displays all tasks, regardless of their assigned people or tags. Maybe we > should drop "Starring"? >
I'm not sure I completely get your point. What's the conflict with starring? The only issue I would have with "starring" is that it creates a generic bin on "things you would like to focus on, but you don't know exactly where to put them". Maybe we don't help the user that way since a clear context of relevance is actually not defined for those tasks (which is contradictory to GTG's goal: "Focus on what's relevant"): he/she would better be forced to correctly sort out his/her tasks in a correct bin maybe. > > Task editor > > Instead of "a task", the editor title could be the task title itself. > > That was my intention, it seems that "A Task" wasn't clear enough :-) > > > There should aeybe be a clue about how to go back to the task list in the > header (like the left-pointing triangle in [1]). Also the "Done" label is a > bit confusing: would pressing it mark the as done or return to the task > list? Maybe a different wording (e.g. "Return to task list" - which is a bit > long, though), or just replacing this button by a left-pointing triangle > would do. > > I wonder if it wouldn't more interesting to rearrange the toolbar a bit: > - place "mark as done" and "delete" in the header (e.g. on the right) > - leave only edition-related buttons in the toolbar > > These are good points, i'll consider that in the next mockup. > > > > Maybe the sidebar could be arranged in sections, just like the task browser > sidebar. The first would obviously be "Date". There could be additional > (and/or optional) sections, like "Related tags", "Related people", etc. (it > would thus be a playground for plugins). > > > Again, another good idea. > > > I think, i'll get right to it > -- Bertrand Rousseau _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~gtg-contributors Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~gtg-contributors More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
