-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/18/2005 11:28 AM, David Necas (Yeti) wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 02:17:57PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>
>>This whole discussion is pointless, since GTK+ is LGPL, not GPL...
>
> How does this prevent anyone from creating a derived work of
> Gtk+ and something GPLed and distribute it under GNU GPL?
Matthias' point was that GPL Xara code cannot be integrated into the
GTK+ mainline, because that would force GTK+ to be released under the
GPL. Ditto for Cairo. That doesn't stop someone from forking
GTK+/Cairo and releasing a Xara-enabled package under the GPL, but that
means maintaining what will likely be a very different version (of
Cairo, at least).
> This discussion might be pointless on gtk-devel, but we are
> on gtk-app-devel.
Personally, I find this discussion OT for gtk-app-devel, period, but
nobody asked me ^_~.
-brian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFDVUDi6XyW6VEeAnsRAv9SAKC654M6H8x+/yrw0djZEpcO51uarwCcDzfQ
sGuV/STubobtmjiYKH1S4oI=
=fwsU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
