On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 19:49 +0100, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
> 2005/12/19, Matt Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Sun, 18 Dec 2005, Daniel Pekelharing wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 15:29 +0100, David Necas (Yeti) wrote:
> > > > I'd recommend to simply compile and *test* the app
> > > > successively with Gtk+ 2.4, 2.2, 2.0 till it stops to
> > > > build/work.  Although all 2.x versions are essentially
> > > > backward compatible, there were various subtle behavioural
> > > > changes that may prove critical just for your app and
> > > > something can behave oddly even if it builds.  No
> > > > compatibility list will tell you that.
> > > >
> > > > If you do not care so much, requiring 2.6.0 should be a safe
> > > > bet.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the info!
> > >
> > > I guess I'll just go with requiring 2.6.0,
> > > seeing as the only older versions I have are in rpm packages,
> > > I don't think it would be easy to install them next to my current
> > > version...
> > guessing doenst seem to be the right way on that.
> >
> 
> 
> Maybe to find the lowest version you (Daniel Pekelharing) should see a
> Changelog and/or index of desparected symbols.
> 
> http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/ix03.html
> http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/ix04.html
> http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/ix05.html
> http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/ix06.html
> http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/ix07.html
> 
> http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gtk%2B/ChangeLog.pre-2-0?rev=1.3254&view=markup
> http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gtk%2B/ChangeLog.pre-2-2?rev=1.4000&view=markup
> http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gtk%2B/ChangeLog.pre-2-4?rev=1.5367&view=markup
> http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gtk%2B/ChangeLog.pre-2-6?rev=1.6286&view=markup
> http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gtk%2B/ChangeLog.pre-2-8?rev=1.7010&view=markup
> 
> Regards

Thanks, I'll check those out..

I don't think I need to be _that_ accurate though, when I actually make
the first release the app in question will still be "pre-alpha", I guess
it'll have a lot of other (bigger) problems.. :-)



_______________________________________________
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list

Reply via email to