> However, I learned that for quite a number of methods it is > a good idea to drop the deprecated ones and instead > use the replacements (less buggy, better UI, better source code > readability, less source code, better performance). > Usually it should indeed make sense, because otherwise there > would have been no need to implement a replacement ;-)
Why not use the "deprecated" keyword in the headers? Then at least gcc will warn you if you use deprecated functions and typedefs. This could be made as a macro which gets expanded only if you're using gcc, and if you have something like GTK_WARN_DEPRECATED defined first. _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
