On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 11:55 -0500, Gerald I. Evenden wrote: > I took a GLADE example and managed to get it to run under GLADE. > > It was suggest that I use libglade instead when generating a finalized > program > but still using the *.glade file generated by GLADE. > > But I am now to the point of giving up the whole problem because I cannot get > a libglade system to function. I tried starting to learn by copying some of > the examples on various websites and attempted to get them to compile and > run. But, alas, everyone of the examples had one problem or another and I > failed to get any one of them to function. Part of the problem was that the > examples were frequently incomplete and I could not diagnose what was missing > or how to reconstruct it. > > I attempted to make my original GLADE example link and run with libglade but > was met with a variety of linkage errors and when I finally did get things > linked the program it generated made a variety of 'message's and finally died > with a memory fault.
Unfortunately we cannot help or comment without seeing any of these messages, nor any of your command lines, source code, etc. > > I am about ready to kiss the entire GTK experience off and try ncurses. You probably ought to experiment with ncurses anyway, since it is a very useful toolkit in its own right. However it is orthogonal to GTK in some ways. They aren't really directly comparable. > > My only plea is for an example of libglade that REALLY functions and would > appreciate a pointer. I've attached one that compiles thusly: gcc -o gladetest gladetest.c `pkg-config --cflags --libs gtk+-2.0 libglade-2.0` > > Many thanks. > _______________________________________________ > gtk-app-devel-list mailing list > gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list >
_______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list