Wouldn't that be typedef struct MyMutex MyMutex; rather? Or for short : typedex struct _MyMutex { GStaticMutex mutex; } MyMutex;
Cheers, Jonathan On 7/6/07, Andreas Stricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Alan M. Evans schrieb: > > struct MyMutex { > > GStaticMutex mutex; > > }; > > Unless you add a define like "typedef MyMutex MyMutex" you have to > add the "struct" keyword. Otherwise this is an incomplete type the > compiler grouch about: > > > MyMutex * MyMutex_new() { > struct MyMutex* MyMutex_new() { > > > void MyMutex_free(MyMutex *mutex) { > void MyMutex_free(struct MyMutex *mutex) { > > Cheers, Andy > _______________________________________________ > gtk-app-devel-list mailing list > gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list > -- <Morpheus> linux, c'est une question de VI ou de MORE _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list