Wouldn't that be
typedef struct MyMutex MyMutex;
rather?
Or for short :
typedex struct _MyMutex {
GStaticMutex mutex;
} MyMutex;
Cheers,
Jonathan
On 7/6/07, Andreas Stricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Alan M. Evans schrieb:
> > struct MyMutex {
> > GStaticMutex mutex;
> > };
>
> Unless you add a define like "typedef MyMutex MyMutex" you have to
> add the "struct" keyword. Otherwise this is an incomplete type the
> compiler grouch about:
>
> > MyMutex * MyMutex_new() {
> struct MyMutex* MyMutex_new() {
>
> > void MyMutex_free(MyMutex *mutex) {
> void MyMutex_free(struct MyMutex *mutex) {
>
> Cheers, Andy
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
> gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
>
--
<Morpheus> linux, c'est une question de VI ou de MORE
_______________________________________________
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
