On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 17:10 -0500, Allin Cottrell wrote: > On Tue, 15 Feb 2011, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > > > Requiring the schema for settings is the fundamental tenet of the GSettings > > design. By not having the schema like in GConf you are trading a bit of > > convenience for less safety... > > > > A schema in GSettings is the equivalent of the UI file for GtkBuilder; in > > both cases an application cannot be expected to run correctly if missing. > > If a UI file is missing, I agree, it's all over. No point in > showing a blank window. But a file selector can surely have > reasonable default behavior; it did in gtk2.
just because it stored its state inside a configuration file on disk. in any case, this is a pointless discussion: the schema for the file chooser configuration *is* part of the gtk+-3 installation; if it's not installed then it's either a bug in gtk+ or a packaging issue. it's the equivalent of an header file, or a module provided by gtk+ itself. ciao, Emmanuele. -- W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.name B: http://blogs.gnome.org/ebassi _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
