Hi, so you mean that the getter/setter usually internally calls the dynamic „property“ version where the property is passed as a string? Thus it would make sense that language bindings are fine using the get/set_property methods since there is no overhead.
Best regards, Tobias > Am 05.01.2017 um 08:27 schrieb Gergely Polonkai <gerg...@polonkai.eu>: > > Hello, > > I don't know about others, but in my own code, my_obj_set_property() does > nothing else just calls the setter functions (and the same for getters). It > makes much more sense, and I saw it in a lot of Gtk and Gnome code, too. > > Best, > Gergely > > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017, 19:27 Tobias Knopp <tob...@knoppweb.de > <mailto:tob...@knoppweb.de>> wrote: > Hi, > > I am working on Gtk language bindings for the Julia programming language > (https://github.com/JuliaGraphics/Gtk.jl > <https://github.com/JuliaGraphics/Gtk.jl> > <https://github.com/JuliaGraphics/Gtk.jl > <https://github.com/JuliaGraphics/Gtk.jl>>) and have a question regarding the > accessor methods (methods with „get“ and „set“ in them) and the property > system. > > - Is any accessor backuped with a property and vice versa? > - Which one is to prefer? > > I tried to find documentation on this but have not found anything. > > Thanks, > > Tobias > > > _______________________________________________ > gtk-app-devel-list mailing list > gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org <mailto:gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list > <https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list> _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
