On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 15:30 +0800, James Henstridge wrote: > > Is there any reason to hide destroy() though? If you hide it, you'll > need to provide some other way to destroy toplevel windows, among other > things.
I'd move it to GtkWidget I think. > I'd put this one under "provide sane default values for arguments where > appropriate", for languages that support default argument values (like > C++, Python, Java, etc). > > If language bindings provide default argument values, then it would > probably be good if they use the same defaults :) Sensible. Havoc _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
