On Sat, 3 Dec 2005, Dave Benson wrote: > i have two sort-of related questions: > - doesn't this belong in glibc? > - why isn't it implemented as g_mem_set_table(g_slice_allocator)?
No, the difference is that for no-overhead allocation to be possible, g_slice implementation is using the fact that the size of the struct is available at free()ing time. That's just not the way malloc/free API works. > - dave --behdad http://behdad.org/ "Commandment Three says Do Not Kill, Amendment Two says Blood Will Spill" -- Dan Bern, "New American Language" _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
