Fontana Nicola wrote:
[...]
>I wrote gcontainer with this in mind (the GContainerable interface is
>"compatible" with GtkContainer and GChildable with GtkWidget). Anyway, my
>solution presents some serious problems: I'm misusing the interface to hide
>as much technical details as possible to the implementing objects.
>
>I know it is a huge task but consider this as an idea or a looooong term
>project: I don't think to be the only one with these needs.
>
>
I think you may be overcomplicating things, if for example; the
GContainerable or GContainerIface were implemented by GtkContainer; then
nothing in GtkContainer derivatives would really have to change (unless the
api was drasticly different... but I doubt that). Then this could be
extended
to other object sets and other needs without having to rewrite large pieces
of code.
Cheers,
-Tristan
_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
