On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 10:47 -0400, Tristan Van Berkom wrote: > Matthias Clasen wrote: > [...] > >> > >>I meant, for instance, deprecated functions in non-deprecated files. > > > > > > No, it doesn't touch those. It is really meant to be widget subsets. > > > > On a hypothetical level... could this all be simplified by attacking it > from a makefile level ?
If you look at the patch, it is largely done at the Makefile level. > One could use gcc dependancy output to find out what widgets are required > by other widgets... and then build gtk+ without building the objects listed > in the widgets.exclude file or something similar (./configure > --exclude-list=... ?) > > #ifdef'ing it into the source does feel a little stiff... anyway, thats > just my pie-in-the-sky 2 cent idea... > I don't think we want to allow people to compile GTK+ with arbitrary subsets. Even the 5 subsets of my patch lead to quite a number of combinations, and allowing arbitrary subsets will only make it worse. _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
