Hi everyone, I wanted to ask if anyone has considered why g_object_set_valist() is passing 0 as the flags argument to G_VALUE_COLLECT() when calling object_set_property(). By not passing G_VALUE_NOCOPY_CONTENTS, a string value will be dup'd first. Since the GValue is passed to the function and then unset immediately following the object_set_property() call, it seems as if a copy is not required, as the user code executed in object_set_property() would g_value_dup_string() if necessary.
I'm going to experiment with this locally, but are there any historical reasons for wanting to copy the GValue before calling object_set_property()? Thanks, Andrew Paprocki Bloomberg LP _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
