On 12/26/06, Samuel Cormier-Iijima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,

> This, however, is slightly more complicated, and the performance
> benefits would only be noticed in very large sets of data - I wasn't
> sure if GLib was designed for performance or simplicity and
> convenience. Any thoughts on this?
>

We have always maintained the position that GLib shouldn't provide
more than one implementation of a given data type. See e.g. Owen's
mail from some time ago:

http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2002-March/msg00268.html

Matthias
_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
  • GLib trees Samuel Cormier-Iijima
    • Re: GLib trees Matthias Clasen

Reply via email to