On 10/7/07, Mikael Hallendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 6 okt 2007 kl. 19.41 skrev Christophe Dehais: > > Hi, > > For what it's worth, I like it a lot! > > I personally like it much better than a variant of the current skewed > box.
I wonder if I'm the only person alive that really likes the GTK+ box logo. I love its cranky, not-really-serious look and feel. Granted, it's probably not the best logo in the world for a world-class toolkit, and it could use a refreshment, but going for the usual corporate-logo-with-reflections-and-bland-colors would be a downer for me. My useless 2 cents in the classic bike shed discussion :) Cheers, Xan > > Cheers, > Micke > > > Hi list! > > > > Today, I got bored of my work, so I played a bit with Inskape and came > > up with another logo proposition. I can't get anything inspiring out > > of the "cube" design, so here is a completely different approach. It's > > not very colorful, but maybe the original blue green and red colors > > could find there way as some shade or reflection. > > > > cheers, > > Christophe > > > > > > On 5/29/07, Christophe Dehais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Keeping the cube idea, I added some perspective to it (instead of a > >> somewhat flat orthographic projection). > >> > >> I agree with the 'fragile' remark. Maybe having glossy but not > >> transparent faces ? > >> > >> Attached an inkscape file (with a perspective helper on one layer) > >> and a preview. > >> The letters should also have correct perspective. > >> > >> cheers, > >> Christophe. > >> > >> > >> > >> On 5/29/07, Mathias Hasselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Am Dienstag, den 29.05.2007, 01:31 +0200 schrieb Felix Rabe > >>> (public): > >>>>>>> I wonder where the GTK logo proposal went? I think it would > >>>>>>> fit quite > >>>>>>> well in this design. > >>>>>> Actually Andreas was doing some work there. I was sent a few > >>>>>> ideas and > >>>>>> they looked good, but nothing further so far. > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> I might have another proposal based on the first one from > >>>>> Christophe > >>>>> ready in a short while. > >>> > >>> Those detached, glossy faces look cool, but they also make the > >>> logo look > >>> fragile. Well, and "fragile" that's definitly not a term I do or > >>> want > >>> associate with GTK+... > >>> > >>> Ciao, > >>> Mathias > >>> -- > >>> Mathias Hasselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> http://taschenorakel.de/ > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> gtk-devel-list mailing list > >>> gtk-devel-list@gnome.org > >>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> <gtk-logo.png> > >> <gtk-logo.svg> > > _______________________________________________ > > gtk-devel-list mailing list > > gtk-devel-list@gnome.org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list > > > > -- > Imendio AB, http://www.imendio.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > gtk-devel-list mailing list > gtk-devel-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list > _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
