Havoc Pennington wrote: > Hi, > > I had a random thought at the summit; what if we add a new library in > the stack (perhaps shipping with GLib or GTK tarball, I don't know). > Call it libgapplication. It would contain: > > - GApplication > - GSettings > - dbus main loop hooks > - ...
Session management? > It would depend on GObject, dbus, gvfs, dconf but be below GDK, Cairo, > and Pango (i.e. no graphics). Do we want to push other parts of what we have in GTK+ today "down" to that library? > I guess this is a direct analog of libgnome, really. > > Maybe a bad idea; we can cram all this stuff elsewhere, either in GTK or > in dbus or in gvfs. Not necessarily a bad idea, at least as long as a CORBA and Bonobo dependency can be avoided, which I hope is not planned. Johan _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
