On 10/25/07, Clemens Eisserer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 5) unimportance: C++ might bring some small speed improvements, or it > > might not (see Qt's linking problems, though they might have fixed > > that), but in any case, 10% speed improvements in a widget toolkit > > internals are almost invisible to the user > > > > .. probably some more I've missed. > > Well I guess 5 and the last point are quite tied together. A strong > paint is maintainance and code readability. When looking at GTK's code > I am quite confused for the first time and getting used to this > strange coding style takes quite some time. > Except QT's signal&slot system I don't know to learn new a new OOP > model just to hack a bit in QT.
Of course, just because GObject is implemented in C, it doesn't mean one has to write C code to use it. Take a look at Vala, for example. Even with no prior knowledge of C#, it was easy to pick up. Last but not least search for "performance problem" on the GTK list's > and the same for the QT lists. It may be that QT just has way less > developers and such search results are stupid in general, but to some > degree numbers talk for themself. (By the way you can also search on > nvidia's linux forums ;) ) > > lg Clemens > _______________________________________________ > gtk-devel-list mailing list > gtk-devel-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list >
_______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
