Am Freitag, den 21.12.2007, 11:05 +0100 schrieb Mathias Hasselmann: > Am Donnerstag, den 20.12.2007, 11:46 -0500 schrieb Havoc Pennington: > > Third, since implementing an interface requires extra boilerplate > > GObject stuff, it would be convenient for authors of a custom widget if > > GtkWidget already did the boilerplate for them. Since for newly-written > > custom widgets, the recommendation would be to always support extended > > layout. > > I don't see the boilerplate savings you talk about? As far as I > understand GObject interfaces, you always need this this single-line > boilerplate for overriding interface methods: > > G_DEFINE_TYPE_WITH_CODE (MamanBar, maman, GTK_TYPE_WIDGET, > G_IMPLEMENT_INTERFACE (GTK_TYPE_IFACE, maman_bar_iface_init))
Not if GtkWidget already implements GtkExtendedLayout->get_min_size() like this: GTK_WIDGET_GET_CLASS(instance)->get_min_size. Then you could easily override the implementation in class_init(). I think this was what Havoc meant. Regards, Sven _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
