El jue, 17-04-2008 a las 23:08 +0000, BJörn Lindqvist escribió: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 7:19 AM, Diego Escalante Urrelo > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey! > > > > I took some minutes to try a bunch of the patches in the bottomless > > pit of GTK+ bugzilla, I put the results of my triaging in > > live.gnome.org: > > > > http://live.gnome.org/GtkLove/PatchTriaging > > > > Most of what I checked can be solved quickly since there are a lot of > > one-liners and nice useful patches. About 6 patches are available in > > docs section, and I think you can agree with me that they can be just > > downloaded, read, committed. > > Nice work! From my reading of README.commits[1], it seem to suggest > that it is sometimes good to be bold. Please correct me if I am wrong > though. E.g. this patch[2] is so trivial and completely harmless, > that it is many times more work letting it rest and waiting for > someone else to review it too, than just committing it yourself.
What I usually do when I find a trivial-to-fix bug in GTK+ or GLib is to file a bug with the fix and then nag the appropriate person in irc. If I'm not mistaken and the fix is actually as trivial as the one I found, I usually get positive responses for committing --way faster than waiting for others to review among tons of bug reports that arrive daily. So, I think you should do something similar if you want those patches committed and the bugs fixed. Claudio -- Claudio Saavedra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
