On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 20:57 +0200, Jean-Yves Lefort wrote: > Rather than calling my suggestions silly, why don't you actually try > to explain how the non-preprocessed, dynamic-only GLib property design > is superior to the Qt design (or at least not inferior), or describe > these specific reasons that you are talking about?
because i really don't give a damn. i don't use GTK+, i use gtkmm, and there is no feature of Qt that i ever find lacking. although Qt has closed the gap, for a long time it was the poor cousin of gtkmm when it came to type-safety, integration with the STL and more. i'm really not all that interested in what happens at the GObject level, other than that it maps into a decently performing layer by the time i interact with it at the C++ level. i also don't want to see glib/gobject developers wasting time trying to do what C++ plus a preprocessor does in plain C or C plus Yet Another PreProcessor. _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
