On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 14:35 -0500, Yevgen Muntyan wrote: > I do not say you should violate the code > of conduct or whatever. It's nice if everybody is nice and fluffy, > yes. But there are also people who are pissed off (that happens), > or tired,
they should not write to gtk-devel-list, then, and instead cool off a bit. > You are doing a disservice to > application developers with this. actually, no. because it provides a clear migration path towards a less crud-encumbered library. > It's a road to 4.0? Give me > a break, canvas can be done now, no, it can't. seriously. unless a half-arsed solution can be called "done now". > and Undo in text widget doesn't > need disabled deprecated API either. yes, because all gtk+ does is revolving around you and your little pet project. > Thing is, nobody wants to > do boring stuff, and suprise! that's why we are in the situation we are now. > Now what, do I get kicked out off the list? (Well, you can't > do that) no, you won't be kicked out - even though Behdad can do that; but as far as I'm concerned, you can go fuck yourself; you and your asshat attitude. +++ for this thread I removed myself from the Code of Conduct, which is obviously useless with poisonous people like you or the QT homeboy on this thread. not only that, I'm also unsubscribing gtk-devel-list because I quite sick and tired of people hijacking development discussions on gtk+ with their own personal little agenda. ciao, Emmanuele. -- Emmanuele Bassi, W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.net B: http://log.emmanuelebassi.net _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
