On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Alexander Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 11:38 -0500, Mike Kestner wrote: > >> If the motivation for removing the types is that, "things aren't as >> beautiful as they could be" then that argument doesn't really outweigh >> the pain of porting existing code. Especially when the cost of >> supporting existing code is so low. > > I think the general problem is that if you have a box type that can > change orientation on the fly, what type is it? A HBox or a Vbox? >
We could avoid that ambiguity by forcing the orientation property to have a fixed value in hboxes and vboxes, at the overhead of installing the property several times... _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
