On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 13:12 +0200, Eugene Gorodinsky wrote: > I haven't programmed much with gtk+, so forgive a noob if this is a > silly question. My first impression when I looked at the architecture > (using GObject etc.) was that this must take quite a bit of processing > cycles and memory. So my question is: is there any room for > improvement by rethinking the architecture (using Vala for some of the > things maybe?) with gtk+ 3.0 in the works this question bothers me a > bit :)
Vala is a high level language which is translated to GObject and C, so
you are proposing to rewrite GObject using GObject.
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: r...@burtonini.com
jabber: r...@burtonini.com
www: http://burtonini.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
