On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Brian J. Tarricone <[email protected]> wrote: > But I don't disagree that NaN or +/- inf should be allowed, assuming > a restriction such as the above isn't in place for the particular > instance of GParamSpecDouble.
This brings up an interesting question.. if the GParamSpecDouble minimum/maximum are -G_MAXDOUBLE/G_MAXDOUBLE, should NaN/Inf be allowed, otherwise not? That would allow a patch to add the functionality without adding new fields to the GParamSpecDouble structure. What does everyone think? Explicit, modifying the structure, or implicit based upon the existing values? -Andrew _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
