On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 5:49 AM, nf2 <nf2.em...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Alexander Larsson <al...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 23:03 -0500, Paul Davis wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:23 AM, Alexander Larsson <al...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > As I'm reading the word Gtk+ here more often: I still believe that a > VFS API shoudn't be tied to a certain UI toolkit. That would be > repeating the mistake KIO did. What about Mozilla, OpenOffice, VLC and > many many others. They should all link GIO (as a VFS API). If libgio > dupulicates too many things they already have, they might be put off. Whether GIO contains DBus support or not has probably minimal influence on whether or not Mozilla or OpenOffice use it. They make their own decisions about what platform to build on and don't care if you think they 'should' use anything in particular. _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
