jcup...@gmail.com wrote: > Sorry, I posted hastily, I do get an annoying number of leaks if I let > it run a little longer, I see what you mean. I'm sure it wasn't as bad > back in 9.04.
I've just tried the helloworld program on Ubuntu 9.04 and the results: ==23067== LEAK SUMMARY: ==23067== definitely lost: 1,551 bytes in 14 blocks. ==23067== indirectly lost: 3,716 bytes in 189 blocks. ==23067== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. ==23067== still reachable: 932,950 bytes in 5,960 blocks. ==23067== suppressed: 94,594 bytes in 1,897 blocks. are not too different from the results from 9.10: ==22566== LEAK SUMMARY: ==22566== definitely lost: 1,449 bytes in 8 blocks ==22566== indirectly lost: 3,716 bytes in 189 blocks ==22566== possibly lost: 4,428 bytes in 107 blocks ==22566== still reachable: 380,505 bytes in 7,898 blocks ==22566== suppressed: 35,873 bytes in 182 blocks > I'll try to make a better suppression file tomorrow. Don't you think that maybe a suppression file is not the right approach to this problem? Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
